Organisational change is widely recognised as a complex, socio-technical process that requires deliberate planning, stakeholder engagement, and transparent communication. When organisational changes—structural, technological, procedural, or cultural—are implemented suddenly and without consultation, research consistently shows that they generate resistance, reduce efficiency, erode trust, and can ultimately destabilise the organisation. This article synthesises scholarly insights on the consequences of such unilateral change processes.
1. Psychological and Emotional Consequences for Employees
1.1 Stress, Anxiety and Uncertainty
Sudden organisational change often triggers uncertainty among employees, who may not understand the rationale or future implications. Studies show that abrupt change correlates with elevated stress levels, job insecurity and emotional fatigue (Vakola & Nikolaou, 2005). These negative emotions reduce employees’ ability to adapt and impair decision-making.
1.2 Decline in Commitment and Morale
Without consultation, employees perceive the change as imposed rather than participatory. This reduces their sense of ownership and organisational commitment. Armenakis and Bedeian (1999) note that employee morale significantly declines when autonomy and voice are ignored in change processes, leading to disengagement.
2. Organisational Behaviour and Performance Impacts
2.1 Resistance to Change
Kurt Lewin’s foundational work and subsequent empirical studies reveal that resistance is highest when change is perceived as coercive or unexplained. According to Oreg (2006), resistance is primarily driven by lack of information and violation of psychological expectations. Unconsulted changes amplify these drivers.
2.2 Decline in Productivity
When employees are confused or fearful, their productivity suffers. Research by Kotter (1996) highlights that unclear communication during change disrupts workflow continuity. Employees spend time interpreting the change rather than performing tasks, leading to efficiency losses.
2.3 Increased Errors and Operational Disruptions
Unplanned or inadequately explained changes in systems, procedures, or designs often produce errors and operational delays (Burnes, 2017). When employees have not been trained or consulted, they make mistakes that compromise organisational performance and customer satisfaction.
3. Breakdown in Organisational Trust and Culture
3.1 Erosion of Trust in Leadership
Trust is foundational to effective leadership. Mishra and Mishra (2013) argue that trust is built through competence, reliability, openness, and care. Unconsulted change violates at least two of these pillars—openness and care—leading employees to question leadership intentions.
3.2 Negative Impacts on Organisational Culture
Abrupt change disrupts cultural norms and shared meanings. Schein (2010) notes that culture supports stability; sudden deviations without consultation fracture this shared sense of understanding. This leads to cultural misalignment and internal fragmentation.
4. Communication Breakdown and Information Gaps
4.1 Rumours and Misinformation
When organisations do not consult employees or communicate effectively, information gaps are filled by speculation. DiFonzo and Bordia (2007) show that organisational rumours thrive under uncertainty and closed communication channels, which can damage cohesion and trust.
4.2 Reduced Feedback Loops and Learning
Unconsulted change disables the feedback process essential for improvement. As Argyris and Schön (1996) emphasize, organisational learning depends on open dialogue. Without consultation, organisations lose valuable insights from frontline staff, resulting in poorly designed or dysfunctional change outcomes.
5. Impact on Stakeholder Relationships and Public Image
5.1 Customer Dissatisfaction
Sudden changes—especially in digital interfaces, policies, or service delivery—often confuse customers and reduce service quality. Parasuraman et al. (2005) report that service disruptions caused by internal organisational instability directly affect customer satisfaction levels.
5.2 Damage to Public Reputation
Organisations seen as unresponsive or autocratic risk reputational decline. Transparency and participation are now expected norms in contemporary governance (Bryson, Crosby & Bloomberg, 2014). Failure to consult stakeholders (internal or external) may be perceived as undemocratic or irresponsible.
6. Legal and Ethical Risks
6.1 Ethical Breaches Related to Employee Rights
Stakeholder inclusion is considered an ethical responsibility. Unconsulted changes may violate codes of ethical leadership and human-centred management (Greenwood, 2002). Employees may perceive imposed changes as neglecting their welfare.
6.2 Increased Turnover and Litigation
Sudden policy changes may result in wrongful dismissal claims, labour disputes, or contractual breaches. Research suggests that organisations experiencing unconsulted change have higher turnover rates and conflict escalation (Cameron & Green, 2019).
7. Strategic Failures and Change Abandonment
7.1 Low Adoption and Implementation Failure
Multiple studies on change management (Hiatt, 2006; Kotter, 1996; Hussain et al., 2018) highlight that lack of consultation is one of the top reasons organisational changes fail. Employees do not support what they do not understand or accept.
7.2 Wasted Resources
Projects launched without adequate consultations often require correction, restructuring, or abandonment, leading to waste of financial, human, and technological resources (Burnes, 2017).
Conclusion
Sudden and unconsulted organisational changes create ripple effects that interfere with psychological well-being, organisational performance, culture, and stakeholder confidence. The scholarly literature overwhelmingly emphasises the importance of transparent communication, participatory processes, and stakeholder engagement. Organisations that ignore these principles risk resistance, operational failure, and long-term reputational damage. Sustainable and effective organisational change requires dialogue, collaboration, and careful strategic planning.
References
-
Argyris, C., & Schön, D. (1996). Organizational Learning II: Theory, Method and Practice. Addison-Wesley.
-
Armenakis, A. A., & Bedeian, A. G. (1999). “Organizational Change: A Review of Theory and Research in the 1990s.” Journal of Management, 25(3), 293-315.
-
Bryson, J. M., Crosby, B. C., & Bloomberg, L. (2014). “Public Value Governance.” Public Administration Review, 74(4), 445-456.
-
Burnes, B. (2017). Managing Change (7th ed.). Pearson.
-
Cameron, E., & Green, M. (2019). Making Sense of Change Management. Kogan Page.
-
DiFonzo, N., & Bordia, P. (2007). Rumor Psychology: Social and Organizational Approaches. APA.
-
Greenwood, M. (2002). “Ethics and HRM.” Human Resource Management Journal, 12(3), 26-43.
-
Hiatt, J. (2006). ADKAR: A Model for Change in Business, Government and Our Community. Prosci.
-
Hussain, S. T., et al. (2018). “Kotter’s Eight Steps Model.” Journal of Innovation & Knowledge, 3(3), 123-127.
-
Kotter, J. P. (1996). Leading Change. Harvard Business School Press.
-
Mishra, K. E., & Mishra, A. (2013). Becoming a Trusted Leader. Routledge.
-
Oreg, S. (2006). “Personality, Context, and Resistance to Organizational Change.” European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 15(1), 73-101.
-
Parasuraman, A. et al. (2005). “ES-QUAL.” Journal of Service Research, 7(3), 213-233.
-
Schein, E. H. (2010). Organizational Culture and Leadership (4th ed.). Jossey-Bass.
-
Vakola, M., & Nikolaou, I. (2005). “Attitudes Towards Organizational Change.” Employee Relations, 27(2), 160-174.
